[ad_1]
The principles are fairly constant:
- The simpler it’s to create and save a video or different file, the extra probably it’s to be misplaced or corrupted
- The extra necessary the info is, the extra probably it’s you’ll discover when it will get misplaced
- The more durable it’s to interchange, the extra irritating it will likely be
We’re all creators now. Podcasting, videoing, photographing, spreadsheeting… and we’re constructing a basis of worthwhile knowledge as we go.
The software program firms that produce the instruments we use push their engineers in some ways, however to not create resilient storage methods which might be certain to honor the hassle and care you set into creating your knowledge. They need you to imagine that they may effortlessly and seamlessly preserve all the info you belief to them, however they really spend most of their time centered on different issues that they deem extra commercially necessary.
That’s as a result of handy, viral or flashy are typically extra worthwhile than resilient and dependable.
When a conferencing app misplaced a video I labored actually arduous to report, I noticed that trusting them was my first mistake. If there’s a one in a thousand probability {that a} file goes to be corrupted or just misplaced, storing it in two locations or recording it concurrently in two methods lowers your probabilities of failure to 1 in one million. I’ll by no means belief them once more, and also you shouldn’t both.
Forewarned needs to be enough. Assume that the software program firm doesn’t care practically as a lot about your work, your recollections or your popularity as you do.
[ad_2]